Paul's blog

Vic Hopson says:

First, I want you to know that I do not wish to argue with you or prove you wrong to anyone. I’d just as soon keep this between us. But as far as Searl goes, you might well be wrong. He very well may have done exactly what he said he did. I say this because I myself am a “magnut” as you call it.

I never believed I could get free energy out of magnets because it violates the Law of Entropy. But I had been researching ways to radically increase the output of electric motors by reconfiguring the permanent magnets they all use to create a more efficient field.

I studied ways to do this for over twenty-five years in my spare time, and was successful in my quest. But my research had an unexpected twist to it.

One day I accidentally discovered a configuration that so radically changed the output of my experimental motor that I was able to decrease the power input required to run it by almost 95%, while producing the same amount of torque and raw power output as before. I was flabberghasted.

The motor was not a “perpetual motion” machine, but it did however, use so little energy to keep it running that for all practical purposes it might as well be.

Because it was at that point I realized that
I was getting more power than I was putting in.
It was impossible. I stopped working on the device for a month. I locked up the shop and left, not wanting to even think about it.
I was deeply disturbed by my discovery. I had
to be missing something.

Somewhere my device had to be getting power. It didn’t make sense. It defied everything I’d ever learned about physics.
I was deathly afraid to even talk about it to my closest friends let alone show it to anyone.

Then one day I went into the shop to get my mower for my best friend. I was gassing it up for him when I heard him yelp, “Damn! What the hell is this, pal?”

Thomas had gone over to my workbench and flipped the switch on my experimental motor. I had it connected to a dry-cell battery, yet the motor was the size and weight of a washing machine motor, with a 5/8″ armature shaft. It began running like crazy.

Tom’s no moron and he instantly snapped to what I had and started hooting like a stinking owl. Well, the cat was out of the bag, so I filled him in. He agreed that it was stone-cold impossible, but there it was, humming along in front of us. We couldn’t deny our eyes.

I got pictures of it running and sworn affadavits from four people. Then I began doing other experiments and discovered another, even more efficient design of this field. I tore down the motor and scattered the parts and put the affadavits in a safety deposit box. I shredded all diagrams and notes, and what remains is in my head. Why? That’s another story that I’ll tell you if you’re interested, otherwise I’m not wasting the time typing it all out.

But the whole point is that there really IS a field that does what Searls claimed. I know…

Sincerely,
Vic

j.smith says:

Have a look at Youtube, and search for ‘Searl’. Searl and his supporters are locked into a seemingly endless slanging match with some sort of professional physicist. He just will not let it rest! He is now even part of Searl’s ongoing book. I hope that he is not litigious, since Searl is libelling him every which way.